Stage 0
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supply chain | Årdal Bio | ||||
| 2 | Process stage | 0 – General vision | ||||
| 3 | Sustainable indicator | Vision | Enablers | Indicators | Level units | Comments/Gaps |
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Economic | Keep value-creating in the agriculture | Large-scale contra smallscale operation | Capasity, investments | 3 GWH - Can be profitable up to 6 mill nok in investments | Estimated potensial. Based on manure, but can theoretically be more with other effective ingredients |
| 6 | Social - cultural | “The green region” - The green community | Increase production as “green products” based on biogasenergy | Positive image New renewable energy Roofstones as "green" products | >80% rating (questionaire) | "Green" products to strenght the able to compete. |
| 7 | Economic | Strenght the position to produce "green" roofstones in Norway | Biogas | New renewable energy production | ??. kwh in step 1 MS % ? | MS = marketshare or prosent |
| 8 | Social | Increase high level of knowledge | To co-operate with the KER-Project | Competencelevel | Be a part of network connected to the KER-project | |
| 9 | Ecologic | Stabilies climate challenges | Less pollution – less use of non-renewable recourses | Saving of Co2, and new renewable energyproduction | Change from Hydroel-energy to bio energy for more than ?? | The co2 neutral hydroelectic energy can better be used to transform to renewable energy at places where its more difficult to transform to other renewable sources |
| 10 | Economic | Increase agricultural profit | Reducing fertilizing production budget New energyproduction | Energy performance Improved efficiency | Keep the level up to days or higher? | |
| 11 | Economic | Protect/conserve agricultural areas | New energyproduction Reducing fertilizer budget | Area km2 | Min. 20?? MS in Norway | |
| 12 | Soc - ecol | Easy progress | Make Ros-analysis scheme | Scheme to be used by municipality | Under progress | |
| 13 | Econ - soc | Long-range profitt to the agriculture | Local value-creating in all positions | Employment, profit | ||
| 14 | ||||||
| 15 | Storyline: | In Norway the electrisityprice are low. That are making problems to get good economy in biogasprojects. | ||||
| 16 | The department are working with green sertificates for new renewable energy, but the frameworkconditions are not ready. | |||||
| 17 | CHP can get green sertificates, but not if its get money from Enova or Innovation Norway | |||||
| 18 | ||||||
| 19 | ||||||
| 20 |
Stage 1
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supply chain | Årdal Bio | ||||
| 2 | Process stage | 1 – Material supply | ||||
| 3 | Sustainable indicator | Targets | Enablers | Indicators | Level units | Comments - Gaps |
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Ecol | Less use of fertilizer | Use of waste from biogasproduction | Quantity of fertlizer | Reduce use of fertilizer with min 10 % | We have to eksport minimum as much as we import |
| 6 | Ecol | Ensolve problems with to small spreadareas | Production of biogas -Breed improvement of wasteproduct | Quantity in and out from plant | In 7000 m3 manure | |
| 7 | Econ | Find useful use of “organic waste” | Rawmaterials to biogasproduction: Fish from local fishfarms Manure from cattles Peel from turnips | Price waste for each produced energyunits | 7000 m3 manure from cattle + pigs - 1000 ton fishwaste | salmon from Marine Harvest. Pris? N-øre pr. kg. Have to make an agreement for delivery. Peels from turnips is just a later possibility. Tank og massetransport can deliver fishwaste |
| 8 | Econ | Find useful use of “waste” from biogasproduction | Fertilizer for sale and own use - less fosfor in future - big value | Quality: Use purpose Price Form (liquid/firm) | Develop a reciep for sale of posphor(fosfor) | Research - Take out phospfor as a clean product (fragmentation) - BATMAN-project (Bioforsk og CBMI) -same challenge as in Finnøy |
| 9 | Econ | Secure rawmaterial (enough) | Make agreements of intensions | Amount raw material Price and volume | Price cattle, fish, turnips? | Note 1. salmon from Marine Harvest. Pris? N-øre pr. kg. Have to make an agreement for delivery - manure from cattles from owners farms |
| 10 | Note1 : For the fishindustry there can be a profit and good image to deliver waste to produce "green" energy | |||||
| 11 | Marine Harvest pays 2500 nok pr. ton to get rid of fishwaste | |||||
| 12 | If there will come a big biogasplant in Nord-trøndelag the most of fishwaste from the westcoast of Norway will be used in that plant. | |||||
| 13 | This will make a serious problem to get nessessary fishwaste to local smaller biogasplants, and the result will be no local smaller biogasplants | |||||
| 14 | Difficult to get longrange agreements because the price will be reduced | |||||
Stage 2
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supply chain | Årdal Bio | ||||
| 2 | Process stage | 2 - Logistics | ||||
| 3 | Sustainable indicator | Targets | Enablers | Indicators | Level units | Comments - Gaps |
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Econ - ecol | Minimal transport, pollution, cost, time and investments | #Coordinate out – and in transport #Ecuipment collaboration #Store collaboration | Loads./. Weights, costs Price transport with own equipment | 7000 m3 manure/15 m3 (wagon)=467 trips | 15 m3 adherent (wagon) a 750 kr/hour = 50 Nok/ton Unsure |
| 6 | Ecological | Minimal transport of rawmaterials to biogasproduction: #Fish from local fishfarms #Manure from farms | Bigger units – capasity. Storestank, vehicle, boat | Loads / weights Capasity Frequences Transportnoice Transportsafety | Research | |
| 7 | Soc - cult | Ensure sos. Acceptance | Info/communication | Positive image | >80% rating (questionaire) | Isnt done |
| 8 | Ecological | Eksport of nutriants | Produce manure/fertilizer for export (heilgjødsel) | Price for transport | Research | |
| 9 | Econ/ecol | Reduced transport costs | Delivered from fishfarms | Price for transport | NOK/ton | No finished agreements- is under progress |
| 10 | Econ/ecol | Minimal transportcost out from plant | Secure ex. Spreadarea nearby plant. Produce/export nutriants | Price for transport | NOK/ton | In progress |
| 11 |
Stage 3
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supply chain | Årdal Bio | ||||
| 2 | Process stage | 3 – Energy production | ||||
| 3 | Sustainable indicator | Targets | Enablers | Indicators | Level units | Comments - Gaps |
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Soc | Energy from biomass that is able to compete with naturegas and el. | Secure high effect | Research - secure most effective mixture | Under progress. Help from UIS | |
| 6 | Econ | Right size of store | research storesize | m3 contra price | kr/m3-production | Under progress. |
| 7 | Econ | Produce energy | CHP-plant | Energyproduction | tot 3 Gwh rawgas = 2 Gwh el and 1 gwh heat | Total Production 400 kwh = 150 kwh el and 250 kwh heat (stemmer ikkje med level unit) |
| 8 | Econ | Predictable trade of energy | Levelling out periods with low use | Price electrisity Price heat | 50 øre/kwh max | |
| 9 | Ecol | Minimize environmental impact | Co2 equivalent, Quantities per waste type, size of spreadarea/land | Answers from Lundsby Bioenergy - external expert We dont have our own expertice | ||
| 10 | Econ | Assure high materials efficiency | Pretreatment, boiler- technology Continius optimization | Energy performance Improved efficiency | As over | |
| 11 | Econ | Low operational costs | Technology | Costs per production unit | ?? mill. kwh | 40 øre kw/h drift.3 kr/kwh investment |
| 12 | Econ | Low operational costs | Financing | Interest rate, security | 6% | Internrente |
| 13 | Econ | Low operational costs | Employees | Competencies | Best competence i Norway | KER (Competence Energy Ryfylke) Project |
| 14 | Econ | Assure high materials efficiency | Process technology | Energy performance | Simular to 3 mill. kwh | 40 øre kw/h drift.3 kr/kwh investment |
| 15 | Soc | Provide and secure employment | Build up local competence. Technical workers | Level of knowledge Number of employees | Number of persons and education level? Year? | |
| 16 | Soc - cult | Ensure sosial acceptance | PR/info campaign, collaboration with local authorities | Positive image | >80% rating (questionaire) | Nothing done so far. |
| 17 |
Stage 4
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supply chain | Årdal Bio | ||||
| 2 | Process stage | 4 – Grid distribution | ||||
| 3 | Sustainable indicator | Targets | Enablers | Indicators | Level units | Comments - Gaps |
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | Econ | Energy for stakeholders use | Short distance Localisation near tradearea | Distance | Max 1 km | Because of to high costs connected to investments. |
| 6 | Econ | Hot water to factory | Pipelines to be planned | Price heat Price grid | 50 øre /kwh + nett /grid rent | 80 N-øre tot Unsure |
| 7 | Econ | Production of electrisity in periods | Sale to main electrisitylines | Price electrisity | 50 øre /kwh + nett /grid rent | 80 N-øre tot Unsure |
| 8 | Sos - econ | Organisation by competence | 1. Production of electrisity, gas 2. Technical solutions 3. Contractors 4. El. net and gridowners | Competencelevel, references, costs | Best know how about operation and biogas plant and grids in Norway | Some contractors, producers of rawmaterials and energy and others try to get contracts within areas they dont have the right/nessesary competence |
| 9 |
